###### Most recent update: 17 Aug 2016

Originating page: Open this email

**#1** *The Chart, Planck scale to CERN Scale*

Triggered by the results of experiments at CERN labs in Geneva and Natalie Wolchover’s well-written summary article in *Quanta* magazine.

Key words: No new particles, Diphoton, CERN (links open in a new window)

**RE:** A chart to focus on numbers from the Planck scale to the CERN-scale

**August 14-17 in 2016**:

Dear (key players in the extended CERN family – see list below):

The many different CERN families may feel like they’ve just hit a wall with the diphoton results; however, there *are* good results emerging. Numbers of people are suggesting that we re-examine the basic-basic assumptions and first principles that undergirds this experimental work. Perhaps it would be good to go all the way back to the Newton-Leibniz debate^{1 }to ask questions like, “Could space-time be derivative of symmetry-continuity?”^{2} Because a simple continuity equation for space-time has been defined from its singularity within the Planck scale all the way to the Age of the Universe, let’s ask, “Might the first 67 notations from the Planck scale^{3} to the CERN-scale^{4} be meaningful?”

Yes, if we use base-2 notation, there are about 200 notations from the Planck Time to the Age of the Universe. The first 67 notations to the CERN-scale have potentially helpful data. Our chart of that data is here: https://bbludata.wordpress.com/1-204/

Please note: The chart is horizontally-scrolled and has over 1300 very simple calculations.

This progression of numbers from the Planck Scale to the CERN scale is assuredly idiosyncratic, but quite curious for its simple logic and rapid transformations from the infinitesimals to the gargantuan. It just might be a place for pure math and geometry that defines the earliest structural possibilities that are beyond the wires of physicality. The Langlands programs are one option to carry this research forward. Other approaches may well include the work within bifurcation theory, cellular automaton, scalar field theory, and more.

1. May I keep you posted on our work to develop this chart further?

2. Do you have any comments, suggestions, or advice? Thanks.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

[1] That two-year debate (1715-1716) is far from over!

[2] An ideal, universal symmetry-and-continuity that eventually gives rise to the space and time that we can measure. It takes the better part of 67 doublings of the Planck scale and it continues to the current 200+ notation such that all simple symmetries, symmetry-breaking and SUSY are all tangibly related. Our research of these numbers in the large horizontally-scrolled chart is on-going. It includes the dimensionless constants, nondimensionalization, renomalization and the role of infinity.

[3] The Planck scale within these web pages is interpreted quite differently.

[4] CERN scale: Within the chart, the CERN scale may well be defined between notations 60 to 80, yet it seems that most of the work of ATLAS and LHC is within notations 66-67-68.

Notes: Though renormalization and regularization, the effects of infinities were minimized to such a degree that any deeper research of the finite and infinite relation was also minimized.

The role of dimensionless constant and all the physical constants are being followed.

**************

**Sent to the following R&D poeople associated with CERN**:

August 14-15, 2016: Nima Arkani-Hamed, Jaroslav Trnka, Raman Sundrum, Frank Potter, Tao Han, Yifang Wang, David Gross, Melissa Franklin, Jesse Thaler, Clifford Cheung, Adam Falkowski, Savas Dimopoulos, Fabiola Gianotti, Maria Spiropulu, Albert de Roeck, Joe Incandela, Kyle Cranmer, Nathaniel Craig…